POPULAR, INC. Business
The company's own words from the Business item of each annual report, in the filing's order.
- 2023: Section Item 1. Business; Text General; Document 10-K.
Business, as filed
The company's own words from the Business item of each annual report, verbatim and in the filing's order, split at the filing's own headings. Nothing is summarised or reworded. Tables and images are not shown; the document has them.
| Fiscal year | Section | Text | Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Item 1. Business | General Popular is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company, registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”), and subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”). Popular was incorporated in 1984 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and is the largest financial institution based in Puerto Rico, with consolidated assets of $70.8 billion, total deposits of $63.6 billion and stockholders’ equity of $5.1 billion at December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2023, we ranked among the 50 largest U.S. bank holding companies based on total assets according to information gathered and disclosed by the Federal Reserve Board. We operate in two principal markets: ● Puerto Rico: We provide retail, mortgage and commercial banking services through our principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular” or “BPPR”), as well as auto and equipment leasing and financing, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. BPPR’s deposits are insured under the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The banking operations of BPPR are primarily based in Puerto Rico, where BPPR has the largest retail banking franchise. ● Mainland United States: We provide retail, mortgage and commercial banking services through our New York-chartered banking subsidiary, Popular Bank (“PB” or “Popular U.S.”), which has branches in New York, New Jersey and Florida; as well as investment and insurance services, and commercial direct financing leases through specialized subsidiaries. PB’s deposits are insured under the DIF of the FDIC. ● BPPR also conducts banking operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands, the British Virgin Islands and New York. In addition to BPPR’s commercial banking operations in New York that include direct loan origination and participating loans originated by PB, BPPR offers or holds financial products on a National scale in the U.S. market, including personal loans previously originated under the E-Loan brand, purchased personal loans originated by third parties, and gathering insured institutional deposits via online deposit gathering platforms. In the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, BPPR offers a range of banking products, including loans and deposits to both retail and commercial customers. For further information about the Corporation’s results segregated by its reportable segments, see “Reportable Segment Results” in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section (“MD&A”) and Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K. Transformation Initiative: The Corporation launched a significant, multi-year, broad-based technological and business process transformation during the second half of 2022. The needs and expectations of our clients, as well as the competitive landscape, have evolved, compelling us to make important investments in our technological infrastructure and adopt more agile practices. We believe these investments will result in an enhanced digital experience for our clients, as well as better technology and more efficient processes for our employees, and make us a more efficient and profitable company, allowing us to achieve a 14% return on tangible common equity target by the end of 2025. Our technology and business transformation will be a significant priority for the Corporation over the next three years and beyond. Refer to the Overview section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in this Form 10-K for information on recent significant events that have impacted or will impact our current and future operations. Lending Activities We concentrate our lending activities in the following areas: (1) Commercial. Commercial loans are comprised of (i) commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans and leases to commercial customers for use in normal business operations and to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases or other projects, and (ii) commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans (excluding construction loans) for income-producing real estate properties as well as owner- occupied properties. C&I loans are underwritten individually and usually secured with the assets of the company and the personal guarantee of the business owners. CRE loans consist of loans for income-producing real estate properties and the financing of owner-occupied facilities if there is real estate as collateral. Non-owner-occupied CRE loans are generally made to finance office and industrial buildings, healthcare facilities, multifamily buildings and retail shopping centers and are repaid through cash flows related to the operation, sale or refinancing of the property. (2) Mortgage. Mortgage loans include residential mortgage loans to consumers for the purchase or refinancing of a residence and also include residential construction loans made to individuals for the construction of refurbishment of their residence. (3) Consumer. Consumer loans are mainly comprised of unsecured personal loans, credit cards, and automobile loans, and to a lesser extent home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) and other loans made by banks to individual borrowers. (4) Construction. Construction loans are CRE loans to companies, community or homeowners’ associations, or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction loan portfolio primarily consists of retail, residential (land and condominiums), office and warehouse product types. (5) Lease Financings. Lease financings are offered by BPPR and are primarily comprised of automobile loans/leases made through automotive dealerships. Business Concentration Since our business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The concentration of our operations in Puerto Rico exposes us to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Our asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in “Financial Information about Geographic Areas” below and in Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K. Our loan portfolio is diversified by loan category. However, approximately 55% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2023 consisted of real estate-related loans, including residential mortgage loans, construction loans and commercial loans secured by commercial real estate. The table below presents the distribution of our loan portfolio by loan category at December 31, 2023. Loan category (Dollars in millions) BPPR % PB % POPULAR % C&I $4,796 $2,330 $7,126 CRE 4,695 5,888 10,583 Construction Leasing 1,732 - - 1,732 Consumer 6,726 6,969 Mortgage 6,392 1,304 7,696 Total $24,511 $10,554 $35,065 Except for the Corporation’s exposure to the Puerto Rico Government sector, no individual or single group of related accounts is considered material in relation to our total assets or deposits, or in relation to our overall business. For a discussion of our loan portfolio, our deposits portfolio and our exposure to the Government of Puerto Rico, see “Financial Condition – Loans”, “Financial Condition – Deposits” and “Credit Risk – Geographical and Government Risk” in the MD&A and to Note - Commitment and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K. Credit Administration and Credit Policies Interest from our loan portfolios is our principal source of revenue. Whenever we make loans, we expose ourselves to credit risk. Credit risk is controlled and monitored through active asset quality management, including the use of lending standards, thorough review of potential borrowers and through active asset quality administration. Business activities that expose us to credit risk are managed within the Board of Director’s Risk Management policy, and the Credit Risk Tolerance Limits policy, which establishes limits that consider factors such as maintainin g a prudent balance of risk-taking across diversified risk types and business units, compliance with regulator y guidance, and controlling the exposure to lower credit quality assets. We maintain comprehensive credit policies for all lines of business in order to mitigate credit risk. Our credit policies are approved by our Board of Directors. These policies set forth, among other things, the objectives, scope and responsibilities of the credit management cycle. Our internal written procedures establish underwriting standards and procedures for monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality and require prompt identificatio n and quantificatio n of asset quality deterioration or potential loss to ensure the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. These written procedures establish various approval and lending limit levels, ranging from bank branch or department officers to managerial and senior management levels. Approval levels are primarily determined by the amount, type of loan and risk characteristics of the credit facility. Our credit policies and procedures establish documentation requirements for each loan and related collateral type, when applicable, during the underwriting, closing and monitoring phases. For commercial and construction loans, during the initial loan underwriting process, the credit policies require, at a minimum, historical financial statements or tax returns of the borrower, an analysis of financial information contained in a credit approval package, a risk rating determination and reports from credit agencies and appraisal s for real estate-related loans when applicable . The credit policies also set forth the required closing documentation depending on the loan and the collateral type. Although we originat e most of our loans internally in both the Puerto Rico and mainlan d United States markets, we occasionally purchase or participate in loans originated by other financial institutions. When we purchase or participate in loans originated by others, we conduct the same underwriting analysis of the borrower s and apply the same criteria as we do for loans originated by us. This also includes a review of the applicable legal documentation. Refer to the Credit Risk section of the MD&A included in this Form 10-K for information related to management committees and divisions with responsibilities for establishing policies and monitoring the Corporation’s credit risk. Loan extensions , renewals and restructurings Loans with satisfactory credit profiles can be extended, renewed or restructured . Some commercia l loan facilities are structured as lines of credit, which are mainly one year in term and therefore are required to be renewed annually. Other facilities may be restructure d or extended from time to time based upon changes in the borrower’s business needs, use of funds, timing of completion of projects and other factors. If the borrower is not deemed to have financial difficulties , extensions, renewals and restructurings are done in the normal course of busines s and the loans continue to be recorde d as performing. We evaluate various factors to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. Indicators that the borrower is experiencing financial difficultie s include, for example: (i) the borrower is currently in default on any of its debt or it is probable tha t the borrower would be in payment default on any of its debt in th e foreseeable future without the modification ; (ii) the borrower has declare d or is in the process of declarin g bankruptcy; (iii) there is significan t doubt as to whether the borrower will continue to be a going concern; (iv) the borrower has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threa t of bein g delisted from an exchange ; (v) based on estimates and projection s that only encompass the current business capabilities , the borrower forecasts that its entity-specifi c cash flows will be insufficien t to service the debt (both interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and (vi) absent the current modification, the borrower cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for similar debt for a non-troubled debtor. We have specialized workout officers who handle the majority of commercial loans that are past due days and over, borrowers experiencing financial difficulties , and loans that are considere d problem loans based on their risk profile . As a general policy, we do not advance additional money to borrowers who have loans that are days past due or over. In commercial and construction loans, certain exceptions may be approve d under certain circumstances, including (i) when past due status is administrativ e in nature, such as expiration of a loan facility before the new documentatio n is executed, and not as a result of paymen t or credit issues; (ii) to improve our collateral position or otherwise maximize recovery or mitigate potential future losses; and (iii) with respect to certain entities that, although related through common ownership, are not cross defaulted nor cross-collateralized and are performing satisfactorily under their respective loan facilities. Such advances are underwritten and approved following our credit policy guidelines and limits, which are dependent on the borrower’s financial condition, collateral and guarantee, among others. In addition to the legal lending limit established under applicable state banking law, discusse d in detail below, business activities that expose the Corporation to credit risk are managed within guidelines described in the Credit Risk Tolerance Limits policy. Limits are defined for loss and credit performance metrics, portfolio composition and concentration, and industry and name- level, which monitors lending concentration to a single borrower or a group of related borrowers, including specific lending limits based on industr y or other criteria, such as a percentage of the banks’ capital. Refer to Note 2 and Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K, for additional information on loan modifications to borrowers with financial difficulties. Competition The financial services industry in which we operate is highly competitive. In Puerto Rico, our primary market, the banking business is highly competitive with respect to originatin g loans, acquiring deposits and providing other banking services. Most of our direct competitio n for our products and services comes from commercial banks and credit unions. The principal competitors for BPPR include locally based commercial banks and a few large U.S. and foreign banks with operations in Puerto Rico. While the number of banking competitors in Puerto Rico has been reduced in recent years as a result of consolidations, these transactions have allowed some of our competitors to gain greater resources, such as a broader range of products and services. We also compete with specialized players in th e local financial industry that are not subjec t to the same regulatory restrictions as domestic banks and bank holdin g companies. Those competitors include brokerage firms, mortgage companies, insurance companies, automobile and equipment finance companies, local and federal credit unions (locally known as “cooperativas”), credit car d companies, consumer finance companies, institutional lenders and other financial and non-financia l institutions and entities. Credit unions generally provide basic consumer financial services. These competitors collectively represent a significant portion of the market and have a lower cost structure and fewer regulatory constraints. In the United States we continue to face substantial competitive pressure as our footprint resides in the two large, metropolitan markets of New York City / Northern New Jersey and the greater Miami area. There is a large number of community and regional banks along with national banking institutions present in both markets, many of which have a larger amount of resources than us. In both Puerto Rico and the United States, the primary factors in competing for business include pricing, convenience of branch locations and other delivery methods, range of products offered, and the level of service delivered. We must compete effectively along all these parameters to be successful. We experience pricing pressure as some of our competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices for services or the rates charged on loans, increasing the interest rates offered on deposits or offering more flexible terms. Increased competition could require that we increase the rates offered on deposits and lower the rates charged on loans, which could adversely affect our profitability. Economic factors, along with legislative and technological changes, have an ongoing impact on the competitive environment within the financia l services industry. We work to anticipat e and adap t to dynamic competitive conditions whether through developing and marketing innovative products and services, adopting or developin g new technologie s that differentiat e our products and services, cross-marketing, or providing personalized banking services. We strive to distinguish ourselves from other banks and financial services providers in our marketplace by providin g a high level of service to enhance customer loyalty and to attrac t and retain business. However, we can provide no assurance as to the effectiveness of these efforts on our future business or results of operations, and as to our continued ability to anticipate and adapt to changing conditions, and to sufficientl y improve our services and/or banking products, in order to successfully compete in our primary service areas. Human Capital Management Popular seeks to embody our purpose of “putting people at the center of progress” throughout its human capital management. Attracting, developing and retaining top talent in an environment that promotes wellness, diversity, inclusion, learning and transparency are fundamental pillars of our long-term strategy. As of December 31, 2023, Popular has approximately 9,237 employees, none of whom are represented by a collective bargaining group. Nurturing Well-Being: Employee Health & Financial Security Popular believes that the health and financial wellness of Popular’s employees is essential to enable Popular to effectively serve its customers and contribute positively to the communities where it operates. Our health and wellness program includes health, pharmacy, vision and dental insurance, as well as other wellness initiatives. Our programs seek to ensure that healthcare being both accessible and affordable for our employees, with Popular covering up to 90% of health insurance premiums, a figure that surpasses regional benchmarks. In 2023, we launched a leadership guide on mental health to support leaders in promoting emotional wellness within their teams and engaging with team members who may be facing mental health challenges. Additionally, the Corporation promotes employee health and wellbeing by encouraging annual physical exams and maintaining a health and wellness center at its Puerto Rico-based corporate offices staffed with healthcare providers, where employees can complete their physical exam, receive acute care or visit a nutritionist or psychologist free of charge. Our health and wellness center received over 15,680 visits from employees during 2023. Popular also seeks to foster work-life balance by providing paid time off benefits to our employees, including community service leave, paid parental leave and flexible work arrangements. Our hybrid work model, accessible to approximately half of our workforce, underscores our commitment to flexible work environments. Moreover, we continuously offer activities and workshops centered on physical fitness and personal financial management. Popular further provides a 401(k) savings and investment plan, in which 98% of employees participate. Popular matches $0.50 for every dollar the employee contributes to the 401(k) plan, up to 8% of their salary. Moreover, Popular offers a profit -sharing plan, contingent upon the achievement of pre-set financial goals, to further align employee compensation with its collective success. The profit-sharing plan allows employees to receive up to 8% of their eligible compensation (capped at $70,000), of which the first 4% is paid in cash and anything beyond such percent is paid to the employee’s Savings and Investment Plan account. Popular regularly evaluates employees’ base compensation to better compete with the salaries paid in similar positions in other companies. Our ongoing enhancements to our employees’ compensation includes market-aligned salary adjustments, merit increases and raising our hourly pay rates to $15 per hour in Puerto Rico and $16 per hour in the Virgin Islands as of 2023, and $17 per hour in Florida and $20 per hour in New York and New Jersey as of 2022. In 2023, we invested more than $22.5M in enhancing our employees’ compensation. Empowering Growth: Our Commitment to Talent Development We are committed to fostering the continuous development and upskilling of our employees and believe it is fundamental to maintaining our competitive edge. Towards that end, Popular provides development opportunities aimed at strengthening our employees’ knowledge, abilities and skills to support their personal growth which, in turn, seeks to enhance Popular’s business strategies and organizational competencies. Our 40,000 square foot Development Center in San Juan, Puerto Rico and our satellite facilities in New York, South Florida, and the Virgin Islands offer year-round training sessions, activities and workshops. In 2023, we transitioned back to in-person sessions, but also continued offering virtual training programs. Our seven corporate academies had more than 8,000 registrations from our employees during 2023, approximately 1,600 more than in 2022. Our commitment to continuous learning is further supported by offering our employees access to Learning, which provides an extensive library of over 16,000 e-learning courses. In 2023, users totaled 61% of our employees, an increase of 24% from 2022, for a total of 17,006 hours logged during the year. Our focus on training and development has provided internal growth opportunities to our workforce. As a result, the Corporation’s internal mobility rate in 2023 was 36%. This included employees who applied or were selected for vacancies, were promoted, or had lateral movements. Additionally, we invested in the education of over practitioners through Accelerated Development Programs focused on data science, analytics, process excellence, and program management. The Corporation also offered its employees advanced training in software engineering, including, but not limited to, coding and software development. Leadership development remains a priority at Popular, as we believe it is vital for driving results, maintaining employee engagement and achieving our strategic objectives. With this in mind, we launched a new leadership program in 2023 focused on exploring the role Popular’s leaders play in creating the right environment for our culture to thrive. Our organizational development strategy aims to enhance both organizational and leadership effectiveness by preparing us to meet future challenges. In 2023, we facilitated organizational development interventions that focused on change management, team alignment, and leader effectiveness. Enhancing Leadership Continuity through Strategic Succession Planning Popular’s business strategy further takes into account succession planning to ensure effective leadership transitions. Succession plans for senior management are developed by the CEO and presented to the Board of Directors. Popular’s succession planning also leverages our Executive Talent Management Program (the “Program”) that seeks to identify high-potential and high- performing managers, which are provided with learning opportunities to enhance their skills and prepare them for senior management positions. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Popular is committed to fostering a diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace. As of December 31, 2023, 64.5% of the Corporation’s employees were female, and 35.5% were male. Women accounted for 63% of first and mid-level management and 36.6% of executive-level management as of such date. We have recently enriched our talent pool with the inclusion of professionals from Latin America, thereby enhancing multicultural diversity within our organization. Central to our diversity efforts is our multidisciplinary Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) Council, which is overseen by our Corporate Diversity Officer. Our DEI Policy is committed to attracting, retaining and developing a diverse employment population; fostering a work environment where employees are treated equitably and with respect; and seeking, creating, and maintaining business relationships with diverse suppliers. We are committed to fair pay and conduct related pay analyses on an annual basis. The results for revealed a 1.8 percentage point improvement in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands and a 6.4 percentage point improvement in the United States in our gender-related pay differences compared to the end of 2022. Our commitment to gender equality has been recognized in the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index for two consecutive years (2021-2022 and 2022-2023). Our Employee Resource Groups (“ERGs”) are key resources that support our DEI strategy. In 2023, our existing ERGs witnessed substantial growth in membership. Popular Pride, our ERG focused on the LGBTQ+ community, seeks to enhance organizational awareness and engagement of LGBTQ issues. Network of Women in Popular, focused on empowering women, and Popular Embrace, focused on functional diversity, also achieved notable milestones, including partnering with our human resources division to educate and promote specific wellness initiatives and efforts. Additionally, during we established a Black/African American ERG in the US. Popular also supports victims of gender-based violence and provides a special leave of 15 days eligible to employees located in Puerto Rico in order to handle situations related to gender violence, domestic violence or stalking. Employee Experience Popular aims to provide an exceptional employee experience that inspires its employees to deliver outstanding service to customers and communities. We recognize the dynamic nature of employee needs and expectations and have implemented a more robust approach to measure and understand the employee’s journey. In 2023, we revised our comprehensive Employee Engagement & Experience Survey program to (i) increase our assessments from biennial to quarterly and annually and (ii) include additional surveys that measure the end-to-end employee journey from recruiting and onboarding to offboarding. We believe that the insights received from these surveys have allowed us to introduce people initiatives that have helped us reduce our turnover rate to 7.9% as of the end of 2023, a 2.9 percentage point improvement from 2022. Our voluntary turnover rate also saw a notable decrease to 6.4%, down 2.4 percentage points from the previous year. Furthermore, the survey has enabled us to monitor our employee loyalty score and identify initiatives to maintain or enhance our current score of 84%, which positions us within the 75th percentile of the Qualtrics global benchmark and above the average benchmark of the financial industry. Board Oversight in Human Capital The Talent and Compensation Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors has oversight responsibility for the Corporation’s human capital management. As part of its responsibilities, the Talent and Compensation Committee reviews and advises management on the Corporation’s general compensation philosophy, programs and policies, and on the Corporation’s talent acquisition and development, workforce engagement, succession planning, culture, diversity, equity (including pay equity) and inclusion, among other human capital topics. We encourage you to review our Corporate Sustainability Report published on www.popular.com for more detailed information regarding the Corporation’s human capital management programs and initiatives. The information on the Corporation’s website, including the Corporation’s Corporate Sustainability Report, is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Form 10-K or incorporated into any of the Corporation’s filings with the SEC. Regulation and Supervision Described below are the material elements of selected laws and regulations applicable to Popular, Popular North America (“PNA”) and their respective subsidiaries. Such laws and regulations are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. Any change in the laws and regulations applicable to Popular and its subsidiaries could have a material effect on the business of Popular and its subsidiaries. We will continue to assess our businesses and risk management and compliance practices to conform to developments in the regulatory environment. General Popular and PNA are bank holding companies subject to consolidated supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (as amended, the “BHC Act”). BPPR and PB are subject to supervision and examination by applicable federal and state banking agencies including, in the case of BPPR, the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the “Office of the Commissioner”), and, in the case of PB, the Federal Reserve Board and the New York State Department of Financial Services (the “NYSDFS”). Popular’s broker-dealer / investment adviser subsidiary, Popular Securities, LLC (“PS”) and investment advisor subsidiary Popular Asset Management LLC (“PAM”) are subject to regulation by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, among others. Other of our non-bank subsidiaries conduct reinsurance and insurance producer and agency activities, which are subject to other federal, state and Puerto Rico laws and regulations as well as licensing and regulation by the Puerto Rico Office of the Commissioner of Insurance and, for one insurance agency subsidiary, the NYSDFS. Enhanced Prudential Standards Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), as modified by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act and the federal banking regulators’ “Tailoring Rules,” banking organizations are categorized based on status as a U.S. G-SIB, size and four other risk-based indicators. Among bank holding companies with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, the most stringent standards apply to U.S. G-SIBs, which are subject to Category I standards and the least stringent standards apply to Category IV organizations, which have between $100 billion and $250 billion in total consolidated assets and less than $75 billion in all four other risk-based indicators and which are also not U.S. G-SIBs. Bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more are subject to risk committee and risk management requirements. As of December 31, 2023, Popular had total consolidated assets of $70.8 billion. Transactions with Affiliates BPPR and PB are subject to restrictions that limit the amount of extensions of credit and certain other “covered transactions” (as defined in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act) between BPPR or PB, on the one hand, and Popular, PNA or any of our other non-banking subsidiaries, on the other hand, and that impose collateralization requirements on such credit extensions. A bank may not engage in any covered transaction if the aggregate amount of the bank’s covered transactions with that affiliate would exceed 10% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus or the aggregate amount of the bank’s covered transactions with all affiliates would exceed 20% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus. In addition, any transaction between BPPR or PB, on the one hand, and Popular, PNA or any of our other non-banking subsidiaries, on the other, is required to be carried out on an arm’s length basis. Source of Financial Strength The Dodd-Frank Act requires bank holding companies, such as Popular and PNA, to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. Popular and PNA are expected to commit resources to support their subsidiary banks, including at times when Popular and PNA may not be in a financial position to provide such resources. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary depository institutions are subordinated in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary depository institution. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal banking agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary depository institution will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment. BPPR and PB are currently the only insured depository institution subsidiaries of Popular and PNA. Resolution Planning and Resolution-Related Requirements A bank holding company with $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets (or that is a Category III firm based on certain risk-based indicators described in the Tailoring Rules) is required to report periodically to the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board such company’s plan for its rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. In addition, insured depository institutions with total assets of $50 billion or more are required to submit to the FDIC periodic contingency plans for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. In 2018, the FDIC issued a moratorium on resolution plans for insured depository institutions with more than $50 billion in assets. The moratorium is still in effect for insured depository institutions with more than $50 billion but less than $100 billion in assets. On August 29, 2023, the FDIC proposed amendments to the resolution planning requirements for insured depository institutions with $50 billion or more in total assets. The amendments would require insured depository institutions with between $50 billion and $100 billion in assets to submit informational filings on a two-year cycle, with an interim supplement updating key information submitted in the off years. On August 29, 2023, the Federal Reserve Board, FDIC and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) issued a proposed rule that would require bank holding companies and insured depository institutions with $100 billion or more in consolidated assets (as well as their insured depository institution affiliates) to maintain minimum amounts of eligible long-term debt (generally, debt that is unsecured, has a maturity greater than one year from issuance and satisfies additional criteria), subject to a three-year phase-in period. The proposal would also apply “clean holding company” requirements to Category II through IV bank holding companies, which would, among other things, prohibit entering into derivatives and certain other financial contracts with third parties. As of December 31, 2023, Popular, PNA, BPPR and PB’s total assets were below the thresholds for applicability of these rules, except that BPPR would be subject to the FDIC’s proposed amendments to its resolution planning requirements applicable to insured depository institutions with more than $50 billion but less than $100 billion in assets (if those amendments are adopted as proposed). FDIC Insurance Substantially all the deposits of BPPR and PB are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC, and BPPR and PB are subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. Deposit insurance assessments are based on the average consolidated total assets of the insured depository institution minus the average tangible equity of the institution during the assessment period. For larger depository institutions with over $10 billion in assets, such as BPPR and PB, the FDIC uses a “scorecard” methodology, which considers CAMELS ratings, among other measures, that seeks to capture both the probability that an individual large institution will fail and the magnitude of the impact on the DIF if such a failure occurs. The FDIC has the ability to make discretionary adjustments to the total score based upon significant risk factors that are not adequately captured in the calculations. The initial base deposit insurance assessment rate for larger depository institutions ranges from 3 to 30 basis points on an annualized basis. After the effect of potential base-rate adjustments, the total base assessment rate could range from 1.5 to 40 basis points on an annualized basis. In October 2022, the FDIC finalized a rule that increased initial base deposit insurance assessment rates by basis points, beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC, as required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”), established a plan in September 2020 to restore the DIF reserve ratio to meet or exceed the statutory minimum of 1.35 percent within eight years. The increased assessment is intended to improve the likelihood that the DIF reserve ratio would reach the required minimum by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2028. As of December 31, 2023, we had a DIF average total asset less average tangible equity assessment base of approximately $66 billion. On November 16, 2023, the FDIC finalized a rule that imposes a special assessment to recover the costs to the DIF resulting from the FDIC’s use, in March 2023, of the systemic risk exception to the least-cost resolution test under the FDIA in connection with the receiverships of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. The FDIC estimated in approving the rule that those assessed losses total approximately $16.3 billion. The rule provides that this loss estimate will be periodically adjusted, which will affect the amount of the special assessment. Under the rule, the assessment base is the estimated uninsured deposits that an insured depository institution reported in its Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (“Call Report”) at December 31, 2022, excluding the first $5 billion in estimated uninsured deposits. For a holding company that has more than one insured depository institution subsidiary, such as Popular, the $5 billion exclusion is allocated among the company’s insured depository institution subsidiaries in proportion to each insured depository institution’s estimated uninsured deposits. The special assessments will be collected at an annual rate of approximately 13.4 basis points per year (3.36 basis points per quarter) over eight quarters in and 2025, with the first assessment period beginning January 1, 2024. Because the estimated loss pursuant to the systemic risk determination will be periodically adjusted, the FDIC retains the ability to cease collection early, extend the special assessment collection period and impose a final shortfall special assessment on a one-time basis. Popular expects the special assessments to be tax deductible. The total of the assessments for Popular is estimated at $71.4 million and such amount was recorded as an expense in the quarter of adoption (the quarter ended December 31, 2023). As of December 31, 2023, the FDIC’s loss estimate described in the final rule had increased by approximately $4.1 billion to $20.4 billion, or approximately 25%. If such increase in the FDIC’s loss estimate remains unchanged and is assessed in the same manner, the Corporation estimates that the incremental expense for the special assessments could be approximately $18 million. Brokered Deposits The FDIA and regulations adopted thereunder restrict the use of brokered deposits and the rate of interest payable on deposits for institutions that are less than well capitalized. Popular does not believe the brokered deposits regulations have had or will have a material effect on the funding or liquidity of BPPR and PB. Capital Adequacy Popular, PNA, BPPR and PB are each required to comply with applicable capital adequacy standards established by the federal banking agencies (the “Capital Rules”), which implement the Basel III framework set forth by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) as well as certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other matters, the Capital Rules: (i) impose a capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”) and the related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets; (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised requirements; and (iii) mandate that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital. Under the Capital Rules, for most banking organizations, including Popular, the most common form of Additional Tier capital is non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allocation for loan and lease losses, in each case, subject to the Capital Rules’ specific requirements. Pursuant to the Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios are: 4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets; 6.0% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets; 8.0% Total capital (that is, Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets; and 4% Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”). The Capital Rules also impose a “capital conservation buffer,” composed entirely of CET1, on top of these minimum risk- weighted asset ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall and eligible retained income (that is, four quarter trailing net income, net of distributions and tax effects not reflected in net income). Thus, Popular, BPPR and PB are required to maintain such additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of CET1, effectively resulting in minimum ratios of (i) CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7%, (ii) Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.5%, and (iii) Total capital to risk- weighted assets of at least 10.5%. In addition, under prior risk-based capital rules, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCI”) items included in stockholders’ equity (for example, marks-to-market of securities held in the available for sale portfolio) under U.S. GAAP were reversed for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Pursuant to the Capital Rules, the effects of certain AOCI items are not excluded; however, banking organizations that are not subject to Categories I or II standards under the framework for banking organizations with $100 billion or more in assets, including Popular, BPPR and PB, may make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items. Popular, BPPR and PB have made this election in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of their available for sale securities portfolios. The Capital Rules preclude certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, from inclusion in bank holding companies’ Tier 1 capital. Trust preferred securities no longer included in Popular’s Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital. Popular has not issued any trust preferred securities since May 19, 2010. As of December 31, 2023, Popular has $193 million of trust preferred securities outstanding which no longer qualify for Tier 1 capital treatment, but instead qualify for Tier 2 capital treatment. The Capital Rules also provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. Banking organizations that are not subject to Category I or II standards are subject to rules that provide for simplified capital requirements relating to the threshold deductions for certain mortgage servicing assets, deferred tax assets, investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions and inclusion of minority interests in regulatory capital. Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject Popular and its depository institution subsidiaries to a variety of enforcement remedies, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and to certain restrictions on our business. Refer to “Prompt Corrective Action” below for further discussion. In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post- crisis regulatory reforms. Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’s standardized approach for credit risk (including by recalibrating risk weights and introducing new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally cancellable commitments,” such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the current U.S. capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to Popular, BPPR and PB. On July 27, 2023, the federal banking regulators proposed revisions to the Capital Rules to implement the Basel Committee’s standards and make other changes to the Capital Rules, including the ability of banking organizations in Categories III and IV to elect not to recognize most elements of AOCI in regulatory capital. The proposal introduces revised credit risk, equity risk, operational risk, credit valuation adjustment risk and market risk requirements, among other changes. However, the revised capital requirements of the proposed rule would not apply to Popular, BPPR, or PB because they have less than $100 billion in total consolidated assets and trading assets and liabilities below the threshold for market risk requirements. In December 2018, the federal banking agencies approved a final rule modifying their regulatory capital rules and providing an option to phase in over a period of three years the day-one regulatory capital effects of the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model of ASU 2016-13. The final rule also revised the agencies’ other rules to reflect the update to the accounting standards. Popular has availed itself of the option to phase in over a period of three years the day one effects on regulatory capital from the adoption of CECL. In 2020, federal bank regulators adopted a rule that allowed banking organizations to elect to delay temporarily the estimated effects of adopting CECL on regulatory capital until January and subsequently to phase in the effects through January 2025. Refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K., Note 21 and Table 9 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the capital ratios of Popular, BPPR and PB under Basel III. Refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K Note 2 for more information regarding CECL. Prompt Corrective Action The FDIA requires, among other things, the federal banking agencies to take prompt corrective action in respect of insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. The FDIA establishes five capital tiers: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” and “critically undercapitalized”. A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare with various relevant capital measures and certain other factors. An insured depository institution will be deemed to be (i) “well capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and is not subject to any order or written directive by any such regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure; (ii) “adequately capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and is not “well capitalized”; (iii) “undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a CET1 capital ratio less than 4.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%; (iv) “significantly undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a CET1 capital ratio less than 3%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%; and (v) “critically undercapitalized” if the institution’s tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible assets. An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters. An insured depository institution’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the institution’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes. The FDIA generally prohibits an insured depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company, if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In addition, undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans. A depository institution’s holding company must guarantee the capital restoration plan, up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it becomes undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency, when the institution fails to comply with the plan. The federal banking agencies may not accept a capital restoration plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution’s capital. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized. Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. Critically undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator. The capital-based prompt corrective action provisions of the FDIA apply to the FDIC-insured depository institutions such as BPPR and PB, but they are not directly applicable to holding companies such as Popular and PNA, which control such institutions. As of December 31, 2023, both BPPR and PB met the quantitative requirements for ‘well capitalized’ status. Restrictions on Dividends and Repurchases The principal sources of funding for Popular and PNA have included dividends received from their banking and non- banking subsidiaries, asset sales and proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity. Various statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends an insured depository institution may pay to its holding company without regulatory approval. A member bank must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board for any dividend, if the total of all dividends declared by the member bank during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that year, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, after considering those years’ dividend activity, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. During the year ended December 31, 2023, BPPR declared cash dividends of $200 million, a portion of which was used by Popular for the payments of the cash dividends on its outstanding common stock. At December 31, 2023, BPPR needed to obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before declaring a dividend in excess of $387 million due to its retained income, declared dividend activity and transfers to statutory reserves over the three year’s ended December 31, 2023. In addition, a member bank may not declare or pay a dividend in an amount greater than its undivided profits as reported in its Report of Condition and Income, unless the member bank has received the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. A member bank also may not permit any portion of its permanent capital to be withdrawn unless the withdrawal has been approved by the Federal Reserve Board. Pursuant to these requirements, PB may not declare or pay a dividend without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board and the NYSDFS. During the year ended December 31, 2023, PB declared cash dividends of $50 million, a portion of which was used by Popular for the payments of the cash dividends on its outstanding common stock. It is Federal Reserve Board policy that bank holding companies generally should pay dividends on common stock only out of net income available to common shareholders over the past year and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s current and expected future capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Moreover, under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company should not maintain dividend levels that place undue pressure on the capital of depository institution subsidiaries or that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to be a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries. Federal Reserve policy also provides that a bank holding company should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the bank holding company’s capital structure. The Federal Reserve Board also restricts the ability of banking organizations to conduct stock repurchases. In certain circumstances, a banking organization’s repurchases of its common stock may be subject to a prior approval or notice requirement under other regulations or policies of the Federal Reserve. Any redemption or repurchase of preferred stock or subordinated debt is subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. Subject to compliance with certain conditions, distributions of U.S. sourced dividends to a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are subject to a withholding tax of 10% instead of the 30% applied to other “foreign” corporations. Accordingly, dividends from current or accumulated earnings and profits paid by PNA to Popular, Inc. sourced from the U.S. operations of PB are subject to a 10% tax withholding. Refer to Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” for further information on Popular’s distribution of dividends and repurchases of equity securities. See “Puerto Rico Regulation” below for a description of certain restrictions on BPPR’s ability to pay dividends under Puerto Rico law. Interstate Branching The Dodd-Frank Act amended the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Interstate Banking Act”) to authorize national banks and state banks to branch interstate through de novo branches. For purposes of the Interstate Banking Act, BPPR is treated as a state bank and is subject to the same restrictions on interstate branching as other state banks. Activities and Acquisitions In general, the BHC Act limits the activities permissible for bank holding companies to the business of banking, managing or controlling banks and such other activities as the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be so closely related to banking as to be properly incidental thereto. A company who meets management and capital standards and whose subsidiary depository institutions meet management, capital and Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) standards may elect to be treated as a financial holding company and engage in a substantially broader range of nonbanking financial activities, including securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in nonfinancial companies. In order for a bank holding company to elect to be treated as a financial holding company, (i) all of its depository institution subsidiaries must be well capitalized (as described above) and well managed and (ii) it must file a declaration with the Federal Reserve Board that it elects to be a “financial holding company.” As noted above, a bank holding company electing to be a financial holding company must itself be and remain well capitalized and well managed. The Federal Reserve Board’s regulations applicable to bank holding companies separately define “well capitalized” for bank holding companies, such as Popular, to require maintaining a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% and a total capital ratio of at least 10%. Popular and PNA have elected to be treated as financial holding companies. A depository institution is deemed to be “well managed” if, at its most recent inspection, examination or subsequent review by the appropriate federal banking agency (or the appropriate state banking agency), the depository institution received at least a “satisfactory” composite rating and at least a “satisfactory” rating for the management component of the composite rating. If, after becoming a financial holding company, the company fails to continue to meet any of the capital or management requirements for financial holding company status, the company must enter into a confidential agreement with the Federal Reserve Board to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements. If the company does not return to compliance within days, the Federal Reserve Board may extend the agreement or may order the company to divest its subsidiary banks or the company may discontinue, or divest investments in companies engaged in, activities permissible only for a bank holding company that has elected to be treated as a financial holding company. In addition, if a depository institution subsidiary controlled by a financial holding company does not maintain a CRA rating of at least “satisfactory,” the financial holding company will be subject to restrictions on certain new activities and acquisitions. The Federal Reserve Board may in certain circumstances limit our ability to conduct activities and make acquisitions that would otherwise be permissible for a financial holding company. Furthermore, a financial holding company must obtain prior written approval from the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring a nonbank company with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets. In addition, we are required to obtain prior Federal Reserve Board approval before engaging in certain banking and other financial activities both in the United States and abroad. The “Volcker Rule” adopted as part of the Dodd-Frank Act restricts the ability of Popular and its subsidiaries, including BPPR and PB as well as non-banking subsidiaries, to sponsor or invest in “covered funds,” including private funds, or to engage in certain types of proprietary trading. Popular and its subsidiaries generally do not engage in the businesses subject to the Volcker Rule; therefore, the Volcker Rule does not have a material effect on our operations. Anti-Money Laundering Initiative and the USA PATRIOT Act A major focus of governmental policy relating to financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to help prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act imposed significant compliance and due diligence obligations, created new crimes and penalties and expanded the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA PATRIOT Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. The Anti-Money Laundering Act of (“AMLA”), which amended the Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”), is intended to comprehensively reform and modernize U.S. anti-money laundering laws. Among other things, the AMLA codifies a risk-based approach to anti-money laundering compliance for financial institutions; requires the U.S. Department of the Treasury to promulgate priorities for anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism policy; requires the development of standards for testing technology and internal processes for BSA compliance; expands enforcement- and investigation-related authority, including a significant expansion in the available sanctions for certain BSA violations; and expands BSA whistleblower incentives and protections. Many of the statutory provisions in the AMLA will require additional rulemakings, reports and other measures, and the impact of the AMLA will depend on, among other things, rulemaking and implementation guidance. In June 2021, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, issued the priorities for anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism policy required under AMLA. The priorities include: corruption, cybercrime, terrorist financing, fraud, transnational crime, drug trafficking, human trafficking and proliferation financing. Federal regulators regularly examine BSA/Anti-Money Laundering and sanctions compliance to enhance their adequacy and effectiveness, and the frequency and extent of such examinations and related remedial actions have been increasing. Community Reinvestment Act The CRA requires banks to help serve the credit needs of their communities, including extending credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and geographies. Should Popular or our bank subsidiaries fail to serve adequately the community, potential penalties may include regulatory denials of applications to expand branches, relocate offices or branches, add subsidiaries and affiliates, expand into new financial activities and merge with or purchase other financial institutions. On October 24, 2023, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC jointly issued a final rule to modernize the federal banking agencies’ CRA regulations and respond to changes in the banking industry. Among other items, the final rule introduces new tests under which the performance of banks will be assessed and includes data collection and reporting requirements, many of which are applicable only to banks with over $10 billion in assets, such as BPPR and PB. The effective date of the final rule is April 1, 2024; however, banks will not be required to begin complying with certain provisions of the final rule until January 1, 2026, with data reporting requirements becoming applicable on January 1, 2027. Interchange Fees Regulation The Federal Reserve Board has established standards for debit card interchange fees and prohibited network exclusivity arrangements and routing restrictions. The maximum permissible interchange fee that an issuer may receive for an electronic debit transaction is the sum of 21 cents per transaction and 5 basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board allows for an upward adjustment of no more than 1 cent to an issuer’s debit card interchange fee if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve certain fraud-prevention standards. In October 2023, the Federal Reserve Board proposed amendments to its rules on interchange fees. The proposed changes would establish a maximum permissible interchange fee of no more than 14.4 cents per transaction plus four basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction. The fraud prevention adjustment would be increased to 1.3 cents per transaction. The proposed rule would also establish an automatic update of the interchange fee cap every other year based on a survey of debit card issuers. Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) supervises “covered persons” (broadly defined to include any person offering or providing a consumer financial product or service and any affiliated service provider) for compliance with federal consumer financial laws. The CFPB also has the broad power to prescribe rules applicable to a covered person or service provider identifying as unlawful, unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. We are subject to examination and regulation by the CFPB. On October 19, 2023, the CFPB proposed a new rule to implement Section 1033 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act that would require a provider of payment accounts or products, such as a bank, to make data available to consumers upon request regarding the products or services they obtain from the provider. Any such data provider would also have to make such data available to third parties, with the consumer’s express authorization and through an interface that satisfies formatting, performance and security standards, for the purpose of such third parties providing the consumer with financial products or services requested by the consumer. Data that would be required to be made available under the rule would include transaction information, account balance, account and routing numbers, terms and conditions, upcoming bill information, and certain account verification data. The proposed rule is intended to give consumers control over their financial data, including with whom it is shared, and encourage competition in the provision of consumer financial products or services. For banks with at least $850 million and less than $50 billion in total assets, compliance with the proposed rule’s requirements would be required approximately two and a half years after adoption of the final rule. For banks with at least $50 billion and less than $500 billion in total assets, compliance with the proposed rule’s requirements would be required approximately one year after adoption of the final rule. On January 17, 2024, the CFPB proposed a rule that would significantly reform the regulatory framework governing overdraft practices applicable to banks such as BPPR and PB that have more than $10 billion in assets. The proposed rule would modify or eliminate several long-standing exclusions from requirements generally applicable to consumer credit that previously exempted certain overdraft practices. The proposal would also generally require banks to restructure many overdraft fees, overdraft lines of credit, and other overdraft practices as separate consumer credit accounts that would be subject to those requirements. These changes to the regulatory framework could result in BPPR and PB, among other things, facing higher compliance costs in charging overdraft fees, experiencing a decreased ability to recover amounts extended as overdraft protection, reducing the availability of overdraft protection, and/or charging lower overdraft fees. Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation The U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) administers economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals and others. The OFAC-administered sanctions targeting countries take many different forms. Generally, however, they contain one or more of the following elements: (i) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country; and (ii) a blocking of assets in which the government of the sanctioned country or other specially designated nationals have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including property in the United States or the possession or control of U.S. persons outside of the United States). Blocked assets (e.g., property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences. Protection of Customer Personal Information and Cybersecurity The privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 generally prohibit financial institutions, including us, from disclosing nonpublic personal financial information of consumer customers to third parties for certain purposes (primarily marketing) unless customers have the opportunity to opt out of the disclosure. The Fair Credit Reporting Act restricts information sharing among affiliates for marketing purposes and governs the use and provision of information to consumer reporting agencies. The federal banking regulators have also issued guidance and proposed rules regarding cybersecurity that are intended to enhance cyber risk management standards among financial institutions. A financial institution is expected to establish lines of defense and to maintain risk management processes that are designed to address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials. A financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes for the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If we fail to observe the regulatory guidance, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties. In November 2021, the U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule requiring banking organizations, including Popular, PNA, BPPR and PB, to notify their primary federal banking regulator within 36 hours of determining that a “notification incident” has occurred. A notification incident is a “computer-security incident” that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the banking organization’s ability to deliver services to a material portion of its customer base, jeopardize the viability of key operations of the banking organization, or impact the stability of the financial sector. The final rule also requires specific and immediate notifications by bank service providers that become aware of similar incidents. State and foreign regulators have also been increasingly active in implementing privacy and cybersecurity standards and regulations. Several states have adopted regulations requiring certain financial institutions to implement cybersecurity programs and providing detailed requirements with respect to these programs, including data encryption requirements. In New York, the NYSDFS requires financial institutions regulated by the NYSDFS, including PB, to, among other things, (i) establish and maintain a cybersecurity program designed to enhance the confidentiality, integrity and availability of their information systems; (ii) implement and maintain a written cyber security policy setting forth policies and procedures for the protection of their information systems and nonpublic information; and (iii) designate a Chief Information Security Officer. On November 1, 2023, the NYSDFS adopted amendments to its cybersecurity regulations that represent a significant update to the regulation of cybersecurity practices. The amendments generally fall within the following five categories: (i) increased mandatory controls associated with common attack vectors, (ii) enhanced requirements for privileged accounts, (iii) enhanced notification obligations, (iv) expansion of cyber governance practices and (v) additional cybersecurity requirements for larger companies. Most of the amendments will become effective 180 days after adoption. On July 6, 2023, the SEC adopted new rules that would require registrants, such as Popular, to (i) report material cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K and, (ii) disclose in Annual Report on Form 10-K cybersecurity policies and procedures and governance practices, including at the board and management levels. Many states and foreign governments have also recently implemented or modified their data breach notification and data privacy requirements. The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) imposes privacy compliance obligations with regard to the collection, use and disclosure of personal information of California residents, and the November 2020 amendment to the CCPA creates the California Privacy Protection Agency, a watchdog privacy agency, and further expands the scope of businesses covered by the law and certain rights relating to personal information. The substantive obligations under the 2020 amendment to the CCPA became effective on January 1, 2023. In European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation heightens privacy compliance obligations and imposes strict standards for reporting data breaches. We expect this trend to continue and are continually monitoring developments in the jurisdictions in which we operate. See “Puerto Rico Regulation” below for a description of legislations and regulations on information privacy and cybersecurity in Puerto Rico. Climate-Related and ESG Developments In recent years, federal, state and international lawmakers and regulators have increased their focus on financial institutions’ and other companies’ risk oversight, disclosures and practices in connection with climate change and other environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters. For example, on October 24, 2023, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC finalized interagency guidance on principles for climate-related financial risk management applicable to regulated financial institutions with more than $100 billion in total consolidated assets. The principles are intended to support efforts by large financial institutions to focus on key aspects of climate-related financial risk management and cover six areas: (1) governance; (2) policies, procedures, and limits; (3) strategic planning; (4) risk management; (5) data, risk measurement, and reporting; and (6) scenario analysis. On December 21, 2022, the NYSDFS proposed guidance on climate-related financial risk management applicable to NYSDFS-regulated banking and mortgage organizations, including PB. The proposed guidance would address material financial risks related to climate change faced by these organizations in the context of risk assessment, risk management, and risk appetite setting. On March 21, 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule on the enhancement and standardization of climate-related disclosures for investors. The proposed rule would require public issuers, including the Company, to significantly expand the scope of climate- related disclosures in their SEC filings. The SEC also announced plans to propose rules to require enhanced disclosure regarding human capital management and board diversity for public issuers. Incentive Compensation The Federal Reserve Board reviews, as part of its regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as Popular, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. The Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC have issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to discourage excessive risk-taking in the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations in order to not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the U.S. financial regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board, the other federal banking agencies and the SEC, to adopt rules prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to a material financial loss at specified regulated entities having at least $1 billion in total assets (including Popular, PNA, BPPR and PB). The U.S. financial regulators proposed revised rules in 2016, which have not been finalized. In October 2022, the SEC adopted a final rule requiring securities exchanges to adopt rules mandating, in the case of a restatement, the recovery or “clawback” of excess incentive-based compensation paid to current or former executive officers and requiring listed issuers to disclose any recovery analysis where recovery is triggered by a restatement. The excess compensation would be based on the amount the executive officer would have received had the incentive-based compensation been determined using the restated financials. The Nasdaq Stock Market’s listing standards pursuant to the SEC’s rule became effective October 2, 2023. Popular’s clawback policy adopted in accordance with these listing standards is included as Exhibit 97.1. Regulation of Broker-Dealers Our subsidiary, PS, is a registered broker-dealer with the SEC and subject to regulation and examination by the SEC as well as FINRA and other self-regulatory organizations. These regulations cover a broad range of issues, including capital requirements; sales and trading practices; use of client funds and securities; the conduct of directors, officers and employees; record-keeping and recording; supervisory procedures to prevent improper trading on material non-public information; qualification and licensing of sales personnel; and limitations on the extension of credit in securities transactions. In addition to federal registration, state securities commissions require the registration of certain broker-dealers. PS is registered with 35 U.S. state and territory securities commissions. Regulation of Reinsurers, Insurance Producers and Agents Popular’s subsidiaries that are engaged in insurance agency and producer activities are subject to regulatory supervision by the Puerto Rico Office of the Commissioner of Insurance and to insurance laws and regulations requiring licensing of insurance producers and agents. Popular’s reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to licensure and regulatory supervision by the Puerto Rico Office of the Commissioner of Insurance and to insurance laws and regulations requiring, among other things, minimum capital and solvency standards, financial reporting, restrictions on the amount of dividends payable, record keeping and examinations. Puerto Rico Regulation As a commercial bank organized under the laws of Puerto Rico, BPPR is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions, pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking Act of 1933, as amended (the “Banking Law”). Section 27 of the Banking Law requires that at least ten percent (10%) of the yearly net income of BPPR be credited annually to a reserve fund. The apportionment must be done every year until the reserve fund is equal to the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. During 2023, $44.5 million was transferred to the statutory reserve account. Section of the Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than its receipts, the excess of the former over the latter must be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, must be charged against the reserve fund. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and no dividend may be declared until capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital. Section 16 of the Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve that, except as otherwise provided by the Office of the Commissioner, may not be less than 20% of its demand liabilities, excluding government deposits (federal, state and municipal) that are secured by collateral. If a bank is authorized to establish one or more bank branches in a state of the United States or in a foreign country, where such branches are subject to the reserve requirements of that state or country, the Office of the Commissioner may exempt said branch or branches from the reserve requirements of Section 16. Pursuant to an order of the Federal Reserve Board dated November 24, 1982, BPPR has been exempted from the reserve requirements of the Federal Reserve System with respect to deposits payable in Puerto Rico. Accordingly, BPPR is subject to the reserve requirement prescribed by the Banking Law. During 2023, BPPR was in compliance with the statutory reserve requirement. Section 17 of the Banking Law permits a bank to make loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to an aggregate amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the paid-in capital and reserve fund of the bank. As of December 31, 2023, the legal lending limit for BPPR under this provision was approximately $341 million. In the case of loans which are secured by collateral worth at least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the maximum aggregate amount of such secured loans is increased to one third of the paid-in capital of the bank, plus its reserve fund. In no event may the total of unsecured and secured loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation exceed an aggregate amount of 33 1/3% of the paid-in capital and reserve fund of the bank. If the institution is well capitalized and had been rated 1 in the last examination performed by the Office of the Commissioner or any regulatory agency, its legal lending limit shall also include 15% of 50% of its undivided profits and for loans secured by collateral worth at least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the capital of the bank shall also include 33 1/3% of 50% of its undivided profits. Institutions rated 2 in their last regulatory examination may include this additional component in their legal lending limit only with the previous authorization of the Office of the Commissioner. There are no restrictions under Section 17 on the amount of loans that are wholly secured by bonds, securities and other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the United States or Puerto Rico, or by current debt bonds, not in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of Puerto Rico. During 2023, BPPR was in compliance with the lending limit requirements of Section 17 of the Banking Law. Section of the Banking Law authorizes a bank to conduct certain financial and related activities directly or through subsidiaries, including finance leasing of personal property and originating and servicing mortgage loans. BPPR engages in finance leasing through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Popular Auto, LLC, which is organized and operates in Puerto Rico. The origination and servicing of mortgage loans is conducted by Popular Mortgage, a division of BPPR. With respect to information privacy, Puerto Rico law requires businesses to implement information security controls to protect consumers’ personal information from breaches, as well as to provide notice of any breach to affected customers. In addition, as noted above in “Regulation of Reinsurers, Insurance Producers and Agents”, Popular’s reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to licensure and regulatory supervision by the Puerto Rico Office of the Commissioner of Insurance and to insurance laws and regulations. Available Information We maintain an Internet website at www.popular.com. Via the “Investor Relations” link at our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are available, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such forms are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC also maintains an internet website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. You may obtain copies of our filings on the SEC site. We have adopted a written code of ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees of Popular, including our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, in accordance with Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder. Our Code of Ethics is available on our corporate website, www.popular.com, in the section entitled “Corporate Governance.” In the event that we make changes to, or provide waivers from, the provisions of this Code of Ethics that the SEC requires us to disclose, we intend to disclose these events on our corporate website in such section. In the Corporate Governance section of our corporate website, we have also posted the charters for our Audit Committee, Talent and Compensation Committee, Risk Management Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Technology Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors is posted on our website. All website addresses given in this document are for information only and are not intended to be active links or to incorporate any website information into this Form 10-K. | 10-K |